-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nitebirdz wrote:
> OK, let me clarify then. Deprecated doesn't mean it doesn't work, but it > does mean it is not actively maintained anymore and/or only major bug > fixes > will happpen. That appears to be the consensus whenever the issue is > raised > in the Linux kernel mailing list. The most recent thread is covered here: > > http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/kt20031226_246.html#2 You're missing my point. I'm not saying deprecated means anything else that what you wrote above, but I do disagree with you that sysfs/udev is a replacement for devfs right *now*. As your link indicate, udev won't be ready to take over devfs' tasks for another couple of months. If you have a working devfs, I see no point in trying to move to sysfs/udev. Personally, I run udev side-by-side with devfs, and I do like udev a lot. It doesn't mean that I think udev is ready to replace devfs yet. - -- John L. Fjellstad web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkADEHIACgkQkz0vhQtHHRgJfwCglPQ9+fwMrGb3Z49ZuKJfqnyU JqQAoJs9+HRYBjusnqUq3/3sRHhi2d8+ =gmPu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
