On Sat 16 Oct 2021 at 09:28:30 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 10/16/2021 08:13 AM, Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 16 Oct 2021 at 07:42:39 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > On 10/16/2021 07:19 AM, Brian wrote:
> > > > On Sat 16 Oct 2021 at 06:27:49 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > > On 10/16/2021 06:01 AM, Linux-Fan wrote:
> > > > > > Richard Owlett writes:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I routinely place /home on its own partition.
> > > > > > > Its structure resembles:
> > > > > > > /home/richard
> > > > > > > ├── Desktop
> > > > > > > ├── Documents
> > > > > > > ├── Downloads
> > > > > > > ├── Notebooks
> > > > > > > └── Pictures
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > My questions:
> > > > > > > 1. Can I have /home/richard/Downloads be on its own partition?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes. The only thing to consider is that they are mounted in correct
> > > > > > order i.e. first /home/richard then /home/richard/Downloads.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think my question was misunderstood.
> > > > > Perhaps I should have repeated "Disk partitioning phase of 
> > > > > installation" in
> > > > > the body of my message.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Rephrasing my question:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Can I, during the manual disk partitioning phase, specify that
> > > > > /home/richard/Downloads be on its own partition *AND* the rest of
> > > > > /home/richard/ be on its own partition?
> > > > 
> > > > A moun point can be *manually* specified for any partition.
> > > > 
> > > > > > Alternatively, you could mount them at independent times by using a
> > > > > > mountpoint outside of /home/richard (e.g. 
> > > > > > /media/richards_downloads) and
> > > > > > having `Downloads` as a symbolic link pointing to the mountpoint of
> > > > > > choice (`ln -s /media/richards_downloads Downloads`).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2. How could I have found the answer?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > By trying it out :)

  In this thread, on Sat 16 Oct 2021 at 12:39:25 (+0000), Andrew M.A. Cater 
wrote:
  > 
  > Richard: You have the Dell machine - you could always use this for trying
  > things out. There does come a time at which there is too much documentation
  > to find in general terms. Trying a text mode install three or four times
  > with different options and stepping through the questions you are asked
  > would also be a good and useful experiment sometime.

  On Fri 06 Jan 2017 at 11:56:01 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
  > 
  > IIRC the partitioning phase of installer does not allow specifying a
  > label for the swap partition.
  > 
  > [ … ]
  > 
  > I rarely install Jessie more than twice a day ;)
  > Although I may have installed Squeeze 5 times in one day.

https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/01/msg00217.html

> > > > > *BAD* answer.
> > > > > Obviously I was asking how could I have found the appropriate 
> > > > > documentation.
> > > > 
> > > > 0/10? I reckon my answer deserves 10/10 :). Look at what d-i offers
> > > > in its partitioning menu.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > >   Not a 10/10 as it was the d-i menu that prompted the question ;{
> > 
> > You're a hard man! :)
> 
> WHO? ME? *ROFL*
> It may have been hardware rather than software, but >30 years in the
> trenches of tech support (including QA/QC and field inspection) can be
> termed "educational" ;}
> 
> > 
> > > Is there documentation for the details of that sub-menu?
> > 
> > Not that I have seen. The Installation Guide would be the first place
> > to look for it.
> 
> Having written documentation on occasion, I  approve of reading same.
> By three references to placing /var/mail on its own partition
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ hints what I want can be
> safe. But it gives no limits. That's *DANGEROUS*!

If you want to see a blow-by-blow example of the partitioner, you
could revisit this post from a while back. IIRC the thread exercises
most of the wrinkles that could occur if the user interface is
misunderstood.

https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/02/msg00153.html

It's difficult to envisage a time when each and every d-i screen would
be documented at this sort of level. I've no idea what the "limits" are
of which you speak.

Cheers,
David.

Reply via email to