On Sun, 23 May 2021 19:20:29 +0100 Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun 23 May 2021 at 13:52:11 -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > It's not just a question of personal preference; ArchWiki is just > > objectively (often? usually?) much better than Debian Wiki. A recent > > example: compare the ArchWiki U2F page with the Debian Wiki one: > > > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Universal_2nd_Factor > > https://wiki.debian.org/Security/U2F > > > > The Debian page contains much less information than the Arch one, and > > some of the information it does contain (the claim that SSH is "not > > supported yet") is just plain wrong (outdated, I suppose). > > > > Yes, I know it's a Wiki. I have edited a number of pages on the Debian > > Wiki, and I intend to fix up this one, too, when I get the chance, > > unless someone else gets to it first. > > You know what you are talking about. Just do it. It isn't a race > between you and others. I didn't mean to imply that it was a race - I just meant to avoid havinng uttered a falsehood should someone else get to it first ;) Celejar
