On Sun 23 May 2021 at 13:52:11 -0400, Celejar wrote: > It's not just a question of personal preference; ArchWiki is just > objectively (often? usually?) much better than Debian Wiki. A recent > example: compare the ArchWiki U2F page with the Debian Wiki one: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Universal_2nd_Factor > https://wiki.debian.org/Security/U2F > > The Debian page contains much less information than the Arch one, and > some of the information it does contain (the claim that SSH is "not > supported yet") is just plain wrong (outdated, I suppose). > > Yes, I know it's a Wiki. I have edited a number of pages on the Debian > Wiki, and I intend to fix up this one, too, when I get the chance, > unless someone else gets to it first.
You know what you are talking about. Just do it. It isn't a race between you and others. -- Brian.
