-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ace-bugs] Digest Number 961
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> KnowledgeStorm has over 22,000 B2B technology solutions. The most comprehensive IT buyers' information available. Research, compare, decide. E-Commerce | Application Dev | Accounting-Finance | Healthcare | Project Mgt | Sales-Marketing | More http://us.click.yahoo.com/IMai8D/UYQGAA/cIoLAA/r9ewlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> There is 1 message in this issue. Topics in this digest: 1. FW: Re: [ace-users] Bug? in ACE_Connector::connect_i From: "Kobi Cohen Arazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 1 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:30:43 +0200 From: "Kobi Cohen Arazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FW: Re: [ace-users] Bug? in ACE_Connector::connect_i Hi Steve, Just to make it complete. I've investigated the cause of that problem on that specific .NET compiler machine, and discovered that users were building exe with "Debug Multithreaded" "instead of Debug Multithreaded DLL" which caused 2 instances of errno to exists. Thanks, Kobi. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kobi Cohen Arazi > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 11:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] Bug? in > ACE_Connector::connect_i > > > Steve, > > As I promised, I've checked it again, with a clean machine and build. > The original source (without the modification) works. (But > ofcourse :-) > And it should be ... > ACE_SOCKCALL_RETURN sets the errno using ::WSAGetLastError() ... > If that isn't working - nothing will ... > > There was an include/lib mess on the machine where that > problem was introduced to me. > > Thanks, > Kobi. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kobi Cohen-Arazi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:24 PM > To: Steve Huston > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] Bug? in ACE_Connector::connect_i > > > Hi Steve, > > Yes, > I've changed errno to ACE_OS::last_error(). And it worked . > The strange thing was in that point ACE_OS::last_error() == 10035 and > errno == 0 (I've added ACE_DEBUG to that point to verify > that), and the > server side doing the accept call - succeeded. > > PS. Maybe we need to swap the rest of the code so more cases like that > won't happen ? > > Thanks, > Kobi. > > Steve Huston wrote: > > Hi Kobi, > > > > Did you try this fix on your system? If not, please do and > let us know > > how it works. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Steve > > > > -- > > Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation > > Co-author of "C++ Network Programming" and "The ACE Programmer's > > Guide" > > Books, ACE kit and support info at http://www.riverace.com/ > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kobi Cohen-Arazi > >>Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:19 AM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: [ace-users] Bug? in ACE_Connector::connect_i > >> > >> > >>Hi All, > >> > >> ACE VERSION: 5.3.3 > >> > >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > >> Win2k sp4 server. > >> Winsock2 5.0.2195.6601 > >> > >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > >> .NET 7.1 (2003) > >> > >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: > >> #include "config-win32.h" > >> > >> > >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > >> ACE_Connector::connect_i > >> > >> DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: > >> EXECUTION? > >> Yes, The following seems to be incorrect: > >> .... > >> if (result == -1) > >> { > >> if (use_reactor && errno == EWOULDBLOCK) > >> { > >> .... > >> Checkin against errno and not against > >>ACE_OS::last_error() is buggy. > >> > >> I am using ACE_Synch_Options::async, and ::connect() returns > > > > -1 > > > >> with EWORULDBLOCK. However on win32 errno == 0. > >> > >> The soultion will be checking against > >>ACE_OS::last_error() which is > >>very important to do so on win32 platforms. > >> > >>Thanks, > >>Kobi. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
