-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 2:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ace-bugs] Digest Number 960
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> KnowledgeStorm has over 22,000 B2B technology solutions. The most comprehensive IT buyers' information available. Research, compare, decide. E-Commerce | Application Dev | Accounting-Finance | Healthcare | Project Mgt | Sales-Marketing | More http://us.click.yahoo.com/IMai8D/UYQGAA/cIoLAA/r9ewlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> There is 1 message in this issue. Topics in this digest: 1. RE: Re: [ace-users] Bug? in ACE_Connector::connect_i From: "Kobi Cohen Arazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 1 Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:49:26 +0200 From: "Kobi Cohen Arazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Re: [ace-users] Bug? in ACE_Connector::connect_i Steve, As I promised, I've checked it again, with a clean machine and build. The original source (without the modification) works. (But ofcourse :-) And it should be ... ACE_SOCKCALL_RETURN sets the errno using ::WSAGetLastError() ... If that isn't working - nothing will ... There was an include/lib mess on the machine where that problem was introduced to me. Thanks, Kobi. -----Original Message----- From: Kobi Cohen-Arazi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:24 PM To: Steve Huston Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] Bug? in ACE_Connector::connect_i Hi Steve, Yes, I've changed errno to ACE_OS::last_error(). And it worked . The strange thing was in that point ACE_OS::last_error() == 10035 and errno == 0 (I've added ACE_DEBUG to that point to verify that), and the server side doing the accept call - succeeded. PS. Maybe we need to swap the rest of the code so more cases like that won't happen ? Thanks, Kobi. Steve Huston wrote: > Hi Kobi, > > Did you try this fix on your system? If not, please do and let us know > how it works. > > Thanks, > > -Steve > > -- > Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation > Co-author of "C++ Network Programming" and "The ACE Programmer's > Guide" > Books, ACE kit and support info at http://www.riverace.com/ > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kobi Cohen-Arazi >>Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:19 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: [ace-users] Bug? in ACE_Connector::connect_i >> >> >>Hi All, >> >> ACE VERSION: 5.3.3 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Win2k sp4 server. >> Winsock2 5.0.2195.6601 >> >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> .NET 7.1 (2003) >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: >> #include "config-win32.h" >> >> >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: >> ACE_Connector::connect_i >> >> DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: >> EXECUTION? >> Yes, The following seems to be incorrect: >> .... >> if (result == -1) >> { >> if (use_reactor && errno == EWOULDBLOCK) >> { >> .... >> Checkin against errno and not against >>ACE_OS::last_error() is buggy. >> >> I am using ACE_Synch_Options::async, and ::connect() returns > > -1 > >> with EWORULDBLOCK. However on win32 errno == 0. >> >> The soultion will be checking against >>ACE_OS::last_error() which is >>very important to do so on win32 platforms. >> >>Thanks, >>Kobi. >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
