On Thursday 21 February 2019 09:59:53 Celejar wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:40:28 -0500 > > Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote: > > On Thursday 21 February 2019 08:25:54 Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 08:21:00AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:45:50AM +0300, Reco wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > You can also help us by bouncing (as in mutt) spam to > > > > > > report-lists...@lists.debian.org > > > > > > > > This _might_ be a good idea, if that address took forwards. > > > > > > Forwarding and bouncing are completely different operations. If > > > you aren't using mutt/neomutt and don't have a literal bounce > > > feature, then please just ignore this part. > > > > I am not using mutt. TDE version of kmail. And I'd point out that > > the threat of a list unsubscribe is blamed on a "bounce". That > > specific word. > > > > And as far as I know, fetchmail has no ability/facility to bounce a > > message. Fetchmail-6.3.26 IIRC. Locally built from tarball. > > 'Bouncing' a message is typically done by a MUA (Kmail, in your case), > not the MDA (fetchmail, in your case). Other MUAs besides mutt/neomutt > do have 'bounce' options (although they may not always be called > that), e.g., in Sylpheed, it's Message -> Redirect. > > Celejar
kmail has that. I should learn to use it, at least once/ Thanks. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
