Hi. On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 08:43:47AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 21 February 2019 08:32:18 Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 08:21:00AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Thursday 21 February 2019 03:59:37 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:45:50AM +0300, Reco wrote: > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > You can also help us by bouncing (as in mutt) spam to > > > > > report-lists...@lists.debian.org > > > > > > This _might_ be a good idea, if that address took forwards. My > > > incoming chain does not include the ability to do other than accept, > > > then divert to /var/mail/virii or /dev/null. But my one attempt to > > > forward to that address when debians poor spam/viri filters failed > > > often enough to get my attention several years ago, resulted in its > > > being bounced back to me > > > > There's a difference between 'Forward' and 'Bounce'. That e-mail is > > for bounces. > > > > > Don't give me, or my current ISP a hard time because their spam > > > filtering is far better ... using barracuda > > > > LOL. Did you mean *this* Barracuda - [1]? > > The thing's a best possible example of how you *do not* filter spam > > *ever*. > > > Maybe, but it works.
You haven't read the link, haven't you? You ISP's parody for spam filtering will kick you out the list. Just because it's written in such way. Reco
