Hi. On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 08:21:00AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 21 February 2019 03:59:37 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:45:50AM +0300, Reco wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > You can also help us by bouncing (as in mutt) spam to > > > report-lists...@lists.debian.org > >
> This _might_ be a good idea, if that address took forwards. My incoming > chain does not include the ability to do other than accept, then divert > to /var/mail/virii or /dev/null. But my one attempt to forward to that > address when debians poor spam/viri filters failed often enough to get > my attention several years ago, resulted in its being bounced back to me There's a difference between 'Forward' and 'Bounce'. That e-mail is for bounces. > Don't give me, or my current ISP a hard time because their spam filtering > is far better ... using barracuda LOL. Did you mean *this* Barracuda - [1]? The thing's a best possible example of how you *do not* filter spam *ever*. > I believe, or they'll put it in > a spam folder, but thats rare, 4 to 10 msgs a day. Here (office, not this MTA) we have 1 (that's 'one') per week if we're lucky (and on unlucky weeks it's exactly 0). And yes, it's Amavisd + SpamAssassin + Greylistd. Reco [1] http://www.dontbouncespam.org/
