I agree that a fork is too radical, hard to maintain without money and blah blah blah...
We just need "uselessd + new udev" to kick systemd entirely. Then, if a problem appear, lets fix it. And if a new software appearing depending on systemd as PID1, I'll not use it, simple as that. Again, I do not want systemd as PID1 AND I do not want to go back to sysvinit either. So, uselessd seems the way to go. Mostly because it is, what I was thinking systemd was (but it is not slim/tiny), in first place. So, "systemd is a liar". It comes talking about a new init, then, you're dead. I feel betrayed because I was thinking about a new init, not this thing. Now, that I know that systemd is much more than an "init replacement", I don't want it, neither its engulfed udev. I'll have "peace of mind" when I see no systemd sources at all. Maybe in the end of the day, Debian will be forked. Hope not! On 21 October 2014 13:19, Liam Proven <lpro...@gmail.com> wrote: > A blog post explaining why it isn't mandatory, the utter futility of > the fork and more besides, clearly and simply. > > http://www.vitavonni.de/blog/201410/2014102101-avoiding-systemd.html > > -- > Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile > Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven > MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven > Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) • +420 702 829 053 (ČR) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/camtenchwzi76oz74eftkijx0g9ifd0pv0sfle2auyvkqs...@mail.gmail.com > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajsm8j2q3crdzsm+7xhhjuyickaixvurca6uyibrs5cs9ab...@mail.gmail.com
