On 21 October 2014 17:40, Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> wrote: > Liam Proven wrote: >> >> A blog post explaining why it isn't mandatory, the utter futility of >> the fork and more besides, clearly and simply. >> >> http://www.vitavonni.de/blog/201410/2014102101-avoiding-systemd.html >> > > Would be nicer if it was accurate. > > For example, it talks about version pinning as a way to prevent installation > of systemd - except that version pinning doesn't effect the installer.
By definition, no. It cannot. If you're installing, it's a new system and there is nothing to pin. Ergo your objection is egregious. But there is a mandatory *choice* of init system during installation, it says. Is that not true? -- Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) • +420 702 829 053 (ČR) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/camtench7gemrms6ha4go0zb9_4w803eatpdbgfxgvj9tbp3...@mail.gmail.com
