On Tue 21 Oct 2014 at 15:01:18 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:19:08 +0200 > Liam Proven <lpro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > A blog post explaining why it isn't mandatory, the utter futility of > > the fork and more besides, clearly and simply. > > > > http://www.vitavonni.de/blog/201410/2014102101-avoiding-systemd.html > > What I really like about the blog is that, almost from the beginning, > the author lets us know his agenda with words like "trolls". And, just > to make his point with his non-cognizant readers, he quotes Gregory > Smith as just another "anti-systemd-troll", instead of as a guy all of > the anti-systemd people have repudiated and disavowed all alliance with.
Have all the anti-systemd people repudiated Gregory? Here is one who embraces him as part of the fold: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/10/msg00287.html Gregory, please don't do this. It hurts the credibility of the entire group who agrees with you 100% on the issues. There are enough *facts* about systemd, Poettering, Sievers and Redhat to logically and completely make your point. The group "agrees with you 100% ....". Does that look like "repudiation" and "disavowed all alliance with"? It seems more like trying to get someone to toe the Party line. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21102014223810.030107378...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk
