On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:05:14PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Stephen Allen wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:27:54AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >>Martin Read wrote: > >>>On 25/09/14 15:42, Rob Owens wrote: > >>>>I agree that "let's wait until we have a good init to move to" should > >>>>have been more seriously considered, but for some reason people were in > >>>>a big hurry to make a move. > >>>The vote held was "What should the default init system *in jessie* be?". > >>>Given that as the question under discussion, "let's wait until we have a > >>>good init to move to" (implication: there are currently no available init > >>>systems better than the status quo) was perfectly well served by the > >>>ballot option "sysvinit". > >>> > >>> > >>To any developers who may be here: > >>- At one point there was serious talk about a general resolution to overturn > >>the systemd decision. > >>- As I understand it, a general resolution can be called by any developer - > >>while overturning a technical committee decision takes a 2:1 vote of > >>developers > >> > >>Is there not one developer who is willing to propose such a general > >>resolution? > >> > >>Miles Fidelman > >As has been stated many times here - A GR was tried but not enough > >seconds to carry on. > > Actually, no - I've been following this, and related threads, from the > beginning - I have not seen anybody actually mention that a GR was tried. > Do you have a reference?
Not offhand - Sorry I'm not doing your research. Put some of your wasted energy into it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140926190925.GB5388@Jessie
