----- Original Message ----- > From: "Martin Read" <zen75...@zen.co.uk> > > On 25/09/14 15:42, Rob Owens wrote: > > I agree that "let's wait until we have a good init to move to" should have > > been more seriously considered, but for some reason people were in a big > > hurry to make a move. > > The vote held was "What should the default init system *in jessie* be?". > Given that as the question under discussion, "let's wait until we have a > good init to move to" (implication: there are currently no available > init systems better than the status quo) was perfectly well served by > the ballot option "sysvinit". > Agreed. My point was that I think people were in too much of a hurry to change, as if there was some kind of emergency, and I wish that waiting (sticking with sysvinit for now) were more seriously considered. I didn't mean to imply that that choice was not available in the vote.
The vote moved us from one imperfect init to another imperfect init. It was like voting on a beauty contest before the contestants had even finished doing their hair, just because we were so intent on removing the crown from last year's winner. -Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/585343013.3783962.1411659074139.javamail.zim...@ptd.net
