On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:42 AM, James Allsopp <jamesaalls...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 20 November 2013 10:00, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote: >> On 11/20/13, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: >>> >>> My apologies Slavko, I'll rephrase it, the state of Debian's testing >>> initscripts/systemd seems to be neither fish nor fowl. When I >>> experienced this on Arch Linux during the transition from initscripts to >>> systemd, I didn't use it for perhaps 1 year and then, when the >>> transition was finished, there wasn't the choice to use initscripts or >>> systemd anymore, I installed a new Arch Linux. >>> >>> Switching from initscripts to systemd was the only transition ever, that >>> caused issues for me and I'm still not friend with systemd. >> >> OK, so Arch transition was handled sub-optimally for you. >> >>> since anything else but the >>> speed of booting is a step in the wrong direction, instead of human >>> readable scripts, one big binary blob, associated with the name Lennart >>> P.. Seriously, systemd is crap, >> >> Ralph, please write a constructive "problem" and not a >> "ad-hominem against software attack" non-argument. >> >> Especially, if you have a personal particular crappiness about >> systemd, which perhaps you disagree about something here: >> >> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-biggest-myths.html >> >> then that would be much more constructive to useful discussion. > > From a casual perusal of the lists systemd, seems to be getting a reputation > as one of the those projects to avoid like pulse-audio and mono, but the > link you sent sounds more reasonable. Is there a good balanced discussion > anywhere?
Please bottom post. LOL systemd and "balanced discussion" are (unfortunately) incompatible. LOL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SxGHisj3Lq+=vegorytgxjox4kvnp8tmdaz9udzkyf...@mail.gmail.com
