On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:02:26PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:26:35AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:22:20AM +0200, David Fokkema wrote: > > > KDE is a very complex package. There were all types of problems. > > > It ran fine in unstable, but you can't promote to testing unless > > > you can compile it in testing, ;-) and have all libs available. > > > > Actually, at the moment, a package doesn't have to be buildable in > > testing in order to be promoted to testing. This is kind of a bug, but > > it's hard enough to get things into testing as it is sometimes ... > > I'll just quit trying to explain these things. I'm obviously not good at > typing quickly while trying to remember what it was that was going on in > debian-kde. I actually _read_ a few of the threads on the subject, but I > don't seem to remember it, :-)
What you said is certainly how a number of people think it *should* work, though, so don't worry. In fact, I think the release manager expressed similar sentiments at one point, but there are conflicting practicalities to consider too. :-/ -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
