-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:02:31AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > You never gave any explaination at all as to why they would be an > > issue, just made a paranoid statement that everybody flat dismissed > > and claimed it as fact. > > I did give an explanation. Work mail must originate from a work SMTP > server. Personal mail has no business being routed through the work SMTP > server. What part of that is there to not understand?
I can understand the whole personal mail not on business servers, but what's wrong with the other way around? I don't see anything ethically or legally questionable about that. If it puts you in a legally questionable position to email something through a mail server other than your employers, then email probably isn't the best way to get it there anyway. > And you still haven't cited that it is a wrong thing to do. Get cracking. > I'm tired of being the only one to cite relevant passages from RFCs. Time > for you, and others, to do their own homework. Obvious design methods don't tend to get documented in RFCs. Sorry if you don't have common sense. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/GO6RJ5vLSqVpK2kRAqlVAJ4wZjiM9zQiZMp5MHz7JE5x1XLnpACgpXPU opyvOoupPI8Ttj6aWI+9WfY= =63uX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
