-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:48:19PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > Explain what validates said non-issues? > > Uhm, no. I have explained them already. The onus is on you to explain > why they are nothing more than paranoid and not valid concerns and problems.
You never gave any explaination at all as to why they would be an issue, just made a paranoid statement that everybody flat dismissed and claimed it as fact. > Note the use of past and present tense in regards to the role of SMTP. > When the relevant RFCs acknowledge that use what leg do you have to stand on? > Are you about to claim the RFCs are wrong and should be ignored. If so may I > ask whom gets to choose which RFCs are correct, which are not and when to > adhere and ignore? Those aren't standards yet. And the only thing I see there is an awknowledgement that there are mailers currently in use that do the wrong thing, not that it's the right thing to do. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/GOwxJ5vLSqVpK2kRAvRoAJ4vkJsZOLiDZbCc6MPeh5sRP/9M8ACfTsj4 7isRjY+RkQ535OSfrx9fCnU= =QUKv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
