On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 07:43:31 +0200 Thomas Krennwallner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > actually sense to split software in several parts or you will end up in > software that does everything (german speaking people would say > eierlegende Wollmilchsau) and nothing because the software developer has > to reinvent all type of software from scratch (or use some fine > libraries) and doesn't have time to hack some new features in.
True. But a client speaking the network protocols that are part and
parcel of how it gets work done is appropriate.
Should a mail client incorporate a text editor, a spell checker, a
full-blown addressbook, todo list and organizer? Hell no. Should it have
basic SMTP support so it can send mail? Hell yes. Does that preclude people
from using an MTA with said client? Hell no. It is possible to put in basic
support and then have the author say "Sorry, if you want more, install an
MTA."
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
| -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
