Hi,

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:33:41PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> Rene, what do you think is better to do here? Not showing the warning, 
> leave a better error message or make sure from real ooo migration 
> meta-packages that above files are removed if needed?

Do not run update-openoffice-dicts. It's obsolete.

Other than that, yes, the openoffice.org migration packages should 
remove/migrate
those conffiles, yes. dictionary.lst is your job, though, it shouldn't exist 
anymore,
but given that you still run update-openoffice-dicts. in a trigger whereas this
isn't needed anymore for years...

And yes, any warning here is buggy. dictionaries-common has no businnedd in 
that dir -
except with dictionary.lst. It should remove the dir if it's empty, yes, but if 
it isn't
it shouldn't complain :)

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110321123801.gd2...@rene-engelhard.de

Reply via email to