Hi Sylvain On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 08:50:54PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Hello Security Team, > > On 05/03/2026 16:20, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > Proposed version scheme: > > p7zip-16.02+really25.01+dfsg-0+deb12u1 > > p7zip-16.02+really25.01+dfsg-0+deb11u1 > > p7zip-rar-16.02+really25.00+ds-0+deb12u1 > > p7zip-rar-16.02+really25.00+ds-0+deb11u1 > > ... > > Is that OK? > > Can you confirm this a correct version scheme? > > For bookworm this gives: > 16.02+dfsg-8 (current version) > < 16.02+really25.01+dfsg-0+deb12u1 (proposal) > < 16.02+transitional.1 (trixie)
dpkg --compare-versions is happy and it looks sound indicating the the real version, the -0+deb12u1 suffix to make sure any potential uper suite packaging would not conflict. I did not really went through the details of the packaging changes, but we have no remaining worries of regressions? If we are confident of the point release updates, having them exposed early/enough time in advance of the point releases might be beneficial. Emilio, with his other hat on from the release team might have some valuable input for this kind of "transition". Regards, Salvatore
