On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:31, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Andrea Glorioso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have still some doubts about the case where you use a modified > > version of RPSL code to distribute "content", in which case it seems > > to me that the RPSL obliges you to redistribute the modified source to > > every recipient of the content. I suppose it doesn't buy much for > > what Real is trying to achieve (from from I can gather, but of course > > Rob's words on this issue are helpful) and is going to be incompatible > > with case (b). > > Yes, this also is a problem, but a separate one.
This is basically our attempt at closing the ASP loophole.[1] Rob [1] http://newsforge.com/newsforge/00/11/01/1636202.shtml?tid=19 -- Rob Lanphier, Helix Community Coordinator - RealNetworks http://helixcommunity.org http://rtsp.org http://realnetworks.com
