Andrea Glorioso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not a lawyer so I won't try to write down the "correct" wording > (whatever that means) but isn't it easy enough to clearly state that > if you modify RPSL-covered code and you *don't* distribute it, you are > not obliged to distribute the corresponding source modifications, too? > > That would solve the "chinese dissident" problem, at least [...]
No, it wouldn't, because Chinese dissidents want to share the software with each other. That's distribution. But they don't want to have to advertise their activities to the Chinese government.
