On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 18:49, Andrea Glorioso wrote: > >>>>> "tb" == Thomas Bushnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > tb> It's not about what's "fair"; they make a license, they get to > tb> have whatever license they want, but it's not a free software > tb> license. > > Last time I heard, FSF was still arguing with Real over the RPSL > compliance to the four basic freedoms. Has this discussion come to an > (official) end, as far as you all know?
*puts on FSF hat* We're still in discussions with them, but the license as it stands isn't FSF-Free. *takes off FSF hat* Maybe for convenience, I'll use [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I've got the FSF hat on, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] otherwise. -- -Dave Turner GPL Compliance Engineer Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF
