Thank you Patrick for clarifying. I thought point-releases of Debian were aimed at uploading newer versions of packages to Stable as long as the feature set remained consistent (no breaking change or major user experience modification).
Does this mean I misunderstood the idea behind point-releases, or do Debian KDE team consider minor releases (eg 6.x) of Plasma to be "too much" of a jump forward, making them unsuitable for point-releases ? Thanks Le lundi 17 novembre 2025 à 19:53, Patrick Franz <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hi Quentin, > > Am Montag, 17. November 2025, 19:08:34 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit > schrieb Quentin Aymard: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm still new to some parts of Debian's and KDE's lifecycle. I think I > > understand that : > > > > - hotfixes from upstream Plasma (6.3.x) should end up in or be > > backported to Debian stable ; > > > > - minor versions of Plasma (eg. 6.5) might at some point become > > available in Debian stable through upcoming point-releases (eg 13.3, > > 13.4, etc) in place of the current minor version (6.3.x) ; > > > > - as opposed to major versions (eg. something like Plasma 7.x far in > > the future) that should only be included in unstable then testing, as > > the "next-stable" channel, preparing the future of Debian 14. > > > > Am I correct ? > > > Partially. Debian Stable will only get targeted fixes ("hotfixes") that > each fix one particular issue. Since Plasma 6.3 is EOL, those will then > have to be backported from newer Plasma releases. > > However, Debian Stable will stay on Plasma 6.3. It is not going to get > Plasma 6.4, 6.5 or whatever. Updating Plasma to later releases would > defy the point of "stable". > > > -- > Med vänliga hälsningar > > Patrick Franz
