------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-11 10:05 ------- Subject: Re: No std::bad_alloc::what() const
"pme at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Especially compared to "bad allocation"? | | Sure, we could change that. I don't think "bad allocation" is any | better than the demangled type name, but we shouldn't be printing | a mangled typeid. Others felt differently. I agree with Phil that we should not have been printing the mangled typeid. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14493 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
