------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-03-10 01:12 ------- (In reply to comment #10)
> Honestly, is "std::bad_alloc" really that much more readable than > "St9bad_alloc"? Especially compared to "bad allocation"? Well, "St9bad_alloc" looks like memory corruption, unless you recognize it's part of a mangled name. I think it is counter-intuitive. Of course, the best would be to have a "bad allocation" string stored somewhere. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14493 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
