------- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-03-09 20:14 ------- Subject: Re: No std::bad_alloc::what() const
"pme at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It appears to me that the original reporter wanted what() to return >> an "intelligible error message" a la icc's "bad allocation", rather >> than "St9bad_alloc" (which does communicate the same information but >> in a more cryptic fashion). > > Slap a _Z on that thing and we could demangle it automatically. The > problems with doing so are that the demangling routines are linked in > when they otherwise wouldn't be (so goes the argument, but I haven't > verified it myself). Honestly, is "std::bad_alloc" really that much more readable than "St9bad_alloc"? Especially compared to "bad allocation"? zw -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14493 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
