On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Considering the "confusion" of having gcc272 as default C compiler > and egcs as default C++ compiler in slink and the arch by arch > switch to new compiler versions, I would propose to switch all > architectures at once, if that's possible. So maybe it's reasonable > to: upload 3.1 after the woody release, make it the default with the > gcc-3.1.1 release? Is this too late for the hurd?
Have you come to a decision on what you want to happen for hurd-i386? Now that unstable doesn't push into Woody anymore, I'd like to file the bug report to request gcc-defaults to get it updated and need to know if I should tell them gcc-3.0 or gcc-3.1. Note that we haven't got a gcc in the archive yet, so if you choose 3.1, we probably won't build 3.0 officially. We don't plan on uploading gcc-2.95 at this point. If it works better to switch all at once to 3.1.1 that's fine too. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- One of the great things about books is sometimes there are some fantastic pictures. -- George W. Bush -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
