Jeff Bailey writes: > `hurd-i386' has just completed an ABI bump. We've been very careful > to keep back packages that depend on libstdc++, as I had heard that > there's some compatability problems. > > Do you object if we declare gcc-3.1 to be our default compiler as soon > as you upload? I just read the archives of this list and it looks > like you folks are ready to go as soon as upstream releases.
I assume Anthony will kill me, if I upload 3.1 before the woody release (or at least as long as all packages for woody need to go to unstable first). The packages are usable (http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/gcc), but would replace some gcc-3.0 packages. Considering the "confusion" of having gcc272 as default C compiler and egcs as default C++ compiler in slink and the arch by arch switch to new compiler versions, I would propose to switch all architectures at once, if that's possible. So maybe it's reasonable to: upload 3.1 after the woody release, make it the default with the gcc-3.1.1 release? Is this too late for the hurd? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
