On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 04:03:15PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Hmm. We've already switched to gcc-3.0 (and so far haven't built a > gcc-2.95 - Our glibc doesn't contain the magic to make everything > friendly between the two) for all the C stuff. I wasn't sure if since > we had a clean slate (There are no packages in Debian for us that are > older than a week or so) if we should use gcc-3.1 right away. > > I'm definetly not pushing for anything before Woody (eg. We haven't > filed a request to get gcc-defaults updated, because we don't want to > risk any accidental problems). I'm just trying to figure out what's > best to plan for. If you prefer that we stick to gcc-3.0 and g++-3.0, > then I will let the buildd go ahead and build the C++ packages. If > you say that I can switch to g++-3.1 in 2 or 3 weeks, then I will hold > off until then on any C++ packages. > > We also don't mind being a test bed, since we're not a released arch, > our users are used to some hardships. =)
Well, I for one would like to see you wait for GCC 3.1. I'm with Matthias; I'd like to see a complete switchover post-woody, for all architectures. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
