Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> writes: > On Fri, 2025-03-07 at 09:51 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> > I have prepared a stub for a "Gateway to NEW" on Salsa: >> > >> > https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team > > Le Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 06:00:55PM +0800, Maytham Alsudany a écrit : > >> Am I correct in assuming that each package to be reviewed will be an >> issue under the "reviews" repo (and possibly also mention the relevant >> package maintainer there)? >> >> Will packages be reviewed upon request, or will it be fine to pick out >> packages from the NEW queue and review them to assist FTP masters? > > The way I envision it, is that people will ask for peer review before > uploading > to the NEW queue.
Could you explain how I would ask for review of a package? I re-read this thread, and the newgateway-team homepages, but I still don't understand how you think the process should work. Could we test the process by reviewing 'litetlog'? https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/litetlog/ It is already in NEW queue, but maybe more eyes on it will catch mistakes before ftp-master review. It will help me understand what you think the process should be here. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
