On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin Wuertele <[email protected]> writes: > >> Seems like you haven't realised yet: only if a maintainer makes >> controversal decisions and several others disagree such a case comes >> before the CTTE. > > Having decisions appealed to the CTTE is not a punishment. It just > indicates that a decision is controversial and the project was unable to > reach a consensus. It's not always possible (and indeed not always wise) > to avoid controversial decisions. > >> Having choices ending up twice within relatively short time before the >> CTTE should give the maintainer a hint. > > It is, for example, probably a hint that the maintainer is working on > something important that a lot of people care deeply about and therefore > have strong opinions about.
Well said. -mz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caolfk3wxeoscjz06nkqg1qtompftkegp3sb05tz5onng5en...@mail.gmail.com
