* Josselin Mouette <[email protected]> [2013-05-22 20:45]: > Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 19:50 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit : > > > Seems to me that luckily not everybody agrees with that approach (CTTE > > #681834, CTTE #688772)... > > Fortunately the CTTE failed to expose me before you did, since they > ended up authorizing the dependency I surreptitiously introduced.
Seems like you haven't realised yet: only if a maintainer makes controversal decisions and several others disagree such a case comes before the CTTE. Having choices ending up twice within relatively short time before the CTTE should give the maintainer a hint. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
