Martin Wuertele <[email protected]> writes: > Seems like you haven't realised yet: only if a maintainer makes > controversal decisions and several others disagree such a case comes > before the CTTE.
Having decisions appealed to the CTTE is not a punishment. It just indicates that a decision is controversial and the project was unable to reach a consensus. It's not always possible (and indeed not always wise) to avoid controversial decisions. > Having choices ending up twice within relatively short time before the > CTTE should give the maintainer a hint. It is, for example, probably a hint that the maintainer is working on something important that a lot of people care deeply about and therefore have strong opinions about. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
