2011/7/21 Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it>: >> I don't think the purpose of your question is concluding the debate, I >> think it just tries to enforce your point of view by presenting your >> goal as an accepted premise. > It still looks like an interesting question to me
Of course it looks interesting to you. It is a question designed to assign 100% of the burden on someone else. Now if the question was: <quote> If portability was made a mandatory requirement for an init system to be adopted, would the systemd porters be willing to implement everything needed to support on non-Linux ports the packages using a non-traditional init configuration, in the way they consider appropriate and without causing a significant burden on the port maintainers? I think that a clear statement from the systemd maintainers about this would help concluding this debate. </quote> that wouldn't be an interesting question would it? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxogep86aq0d4nrb0ckcn5c1hx19dj92o_d2lemjktr...@mail.gmail.com
