]] Juliusz Chroboczek 

| > It's not like boot speed would be the only reason to avoid shell.
| 
| I don't think that avoiding shell implies that all the distribution-
| specific initialisation code must be hard-wired in pid 1.  I'd be more
| sympathetic to the idea of recoding everything in C if the initiali-
| sation code lived in separate binaries.

Like:

: tfheen@qurzaw /lib/systemd > ls
system/                 systemd-fsck*          systemd-quotacheck*         
systemd-shutdown*       systemd-vconsole-setup*
systemd-ac-power*       systemd-hostnamed*     systemd-random-seed*        
systemd-shutdownd*      system-generators/
systemd-binfmt*         systemd-initctl*       systemd-readahead-collect*  
systemd-sysctl*         system-shutdown/
systemd-cgroups-agent*  systemd-kmsg-syslogd*  systemd-readahead-replay*   
systemd-timestamp*
systemd-cryptsetup*     systemd-logger*        systemd-remount-api-vfs*    
systemd-update-utmp*
systemd-detect-virt*    systemd-modules-load*  systemd-reply-password*     
systemd-user-sessions*

?

Really, it's not that hard coded.

Regards,
-- 
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcuyh3cz....@qurzaw.varnish-software.com

Reply via email to