On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 04:09:18PM +0100, sean finney wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'. They > > should > > Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on > > 'libjpeg8-dev', or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev' or > > 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg8-dev' or > > other combinaisons since this is useless and can only cause problem is the > > future. > > what about people wanting to support lenny backports? afaict libjpeg-dev > is a virtual package in lenny, and thus we'd need libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev.
In lenny, libjpeg62-dev provides libjpeg-dev so (Build-)Depending: libjpeg-dev. work fine. Just looks at the number of lenny packages that do that. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100214171126.ge27...@yellowpig
