On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'. They should > Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on > 'libjpeg8-dev', or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev' or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg8-dev' > or > other combinaisons since this is useless and can only cause problem is the > future.
what about people wanting to support lenny backports? afaict libjpeg-dev is a virtual package in lenny, and thus we'd need libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev. sean
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature