On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'.  They should
> Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on
> 'libjpeg8-dev', or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev' or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg8-dev' 
> or
> other combinaisons since this is useless and can only cause problem is the
> future.

what about people wanting to support lenny backports?  afaict libjpeg-dev
is a virtual package in lenny, and thus we'd need libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev.

        sean

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to