On 2010-02-14 16:09 +0100, sean finney wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: >> The first step is to fix packages that Depend on 'libjpeg62-dev'. They >> should >> Depend on 'libjpeg-dev' instead. Please do not make them Depend on >> 'libjpeg8-dev', or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev' or 'libjpeg-dev|libjpeg8-dev' >> or >> other combinaisons since this is useless and can only cause problem is the >> future. > > what about people wanting to support lenny backports? afaict libjpeg-dev > is a virtual package in lenny,
Yes. > and thus we'd need libjpeg-dev|libjpeg62-dev. Could you elaborate? I do not see the problem. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/873a13ltro....@turtle.gmx.de
