On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 20:51:27 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:12:09AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > As a lot of gnome 2.16 currently in experimental has been uploaded for > > > > amd64, there's a lot of it not built for x86 yet. > > > > > > > > I heard several times people claim experimental was autobuilt, but are > > > > there any x86 autobuilder set up for experimental ? > > > > > > There was no i386 autobuilder in the last few weeks. This has changed > > > now, Joerg Jaspert provided a Xen instance on one of his servers, which > > > I set up as buildd tonight and is now happily building packages. The > > > first few experimental gnome packages are already uploaded, rest should > > > follow in the next few days. > > > > (More than a few days later, it seems like still nothing is > > happening...) > > i can see a couple of logs signed by Marc, so what do you complain about > exactly? Marc is working on all packages from experimental, though it > might take a while to build all packages in the right order do get all > packages (like gnome 2.10) compiled in the right order.
I would assume 10 days is enough to "automatically" build all that is in experimental... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
