On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:43:33AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:06:05AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On Tue Jan 23, 2007 at 20:51:27 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > >>> (More than a few days later, it seems like still nothing is > > >>> happening...) > > >> i can see a couple of logs signed by Marc, so what do you complain about > > >> exactly? Marc is working on all packages from experimental, though it > > >> might take a while to build all packages in the right order do get all > > >> packages (like gnome 2.10) compiled in the right order. > > > I would assume 10 days is enough to "automatically" build all that > > > is in experimental... > > > > It is. The missing packages are FTBFS due to insufficient > > build-dependencies. The build-logs for all packages are, as advertised, > > on experimental.debian.net. > > > > All packages that can be autobuilt on i386 have been autobuilt, and that > > was finished more than a week ago. But nice to hear that "nothing" has > > happened. > > Sadly enough, it seems gnome-panel, gnome-terminal, epiphany-extensions, > gnome-applets, file-roller, gedit, gnome-session, yelp, metacity and > some others can't be autobuilt.
To be fair, some of these have build dependencies problems. But I could build metacity and gnome-session... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
