On Sep 07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed > > as depending on udev actually do. > None, because udev isn't actually a hard dependency for any of those > scripts, so listing it as such is wrong. If it's in the picture then it's relevante.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
