On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:09:49PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Sep 07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > Now, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed > > > as depending on udev actually do. > > None, because udev isn't actually a hard dependency for any of those > > scripts, so listing it as such is wrong. > If it's in the picture then it's relevante.
My point being that you don't want to list them as hard dependencies unless you really need udev and can't work with static devices for some other reason. Moreover, some dependencies may depend and may have to be rearranged depending on configuration. I don't think it's possible to express that with LSB-style initscripts, unfortunately. -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
