On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:13:58AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:08:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > >> Yes, http://bugs.debian.org/365597 > >> Although the bug is still marked open, it's at least "fixed enough" now > >> that the package builds again. > > No it isn't. > I've successfully built emacs21 on sid (i386) with (I think) > xaw3dg-dev_1.5+E-12, in other words the version which lacked all xlibs > dependencies. I was surprised, but I guess emacs21 has all xlibs needed > by xaw3dg-dev already as direct build-deps. Or you're building in an unclean chroot. The *only* X dev package emacs21 build-depends on is xaw3dg-dev; so if emacs21 built for you even with the broken version of xaw3dg-dev, that should tell you something about your build environment. > And the latest buildd attempt was on sparc, and it is > "maybe-successful": An accident of the build environment -- it looks like mrpurply had libxaw-dev already installed in the chroot. Every other buildd has failed to build emacs21 using xaw3dg-dev; furthermore, the failure has been analyzed and the bug against emacs21 reopened... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature