Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:39:27PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> >> And the latest buildd attempt was on sparc, and it is >> >> "maybe-successful": > >> > An accident of the build environment -- it looks like mrpurply had >> > libxaw-dev already installed in the chroot. > >> No, I checked that before trying here: It had not. > > No, you did not. Unless you're a buildd admin, you have no access to see > what other packages are installed on the buildd, you only see the ones > pulled in as build-depends.
Yes, but emacs21 *does* Build-Depend on xaw3dg-dev, and it was missing: ,---- http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=emacs21&ver=21.4a-3.1&arch=sparc&stamp=1146691993&file=log&as=raw | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: mailx, libncurses5-dev, texinfo, liblockfile-dev, libungif4-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, xaw3dg-dev, libpng3-dev, libjpeg62-dev, autotools-dev, dpkg-dev (>> 1.10.0), dpatch (>= 2.0.9) | Checking for already installed source dependencies... | mailx: missing | libncurses5-dev: missing | texinfo: missing | liblockfile-dev: missing | libungif4-dev: missing | libtiff4-dev: already installed (3.8.2-2) | xaw3dg-dev: missing `---- What else can that mean that xaw3dg-dev was already installed? But the point is that it doesn't matter. The interesting question is which formerly-xlibs devel packages were installed; and this indeed I cannot know. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
