At 1144653527 past the epoch, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 10-Apr-06, 04:17 (CDT), Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I agree that "Ham Radio" is not too descriptive for > > those outside the circle (myself included). However it > > is consistent with the terminology in the Linux kernel's > > config. > > And how many of our users are going to be digging through > the kernel config? > > +1 for Amateur Radio
That's not the point: the point is being consistent with the terminology in use in the field. They may not recompile their kernels but they are quite likely to load/unload modules, and any research into the kernel's support for this concept will throw up those terms. My vote is for "Amateur Radio" as it happens. -- Jon Dowland http://alcopop.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
