Coin, I don't know Sven enought for a comment, but this is the first time i hear about problems with him.
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Step #2 requires the support of some 15 developers. This meaning 15 is a representative set of 972 persons (1.5%) not randomly choosen, which is obvioulsy wrong, and ridiculously small. What is wrong here, is not even this demand for removal with such a lack of clear evidence (you can wait for supporters, but you should also convince other people, not so much in touch with Sven, you are right), but a complete failure of this procedure. Such a lightweight proposal should never have passed the DAM filter in step 1. Moreover, having only 1*Q persons needed to open such a GRAVE process is so incredible !!! -- Marc Dequènes (Duck)
pgpr9sGDR1jmC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
