Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:51:24PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > They were, originally. Ryan's been very active on it since, and it's >> > diverged a bit from the code you're maintaining. >> >> Then he should send patches and bug reports to the debian >> package. > > When the sbuild package got orphaned two years ago or so, I asked Ryan > whether he would like to maintain it, and he said he was not interested. > Which is totally fine for me and about everybody else. > >> This split between the user/developer visible sbuild and the secret >> actual buildd is just not in the spirit of Debian. > > 1. Please drop the `secret' immediately. Unless you really want to call > http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd `secret'. That your mail got resent > with the this subject to debian-devel-announce is already stressing it > *a lot*, IMHO.
The subject and initial mail is not about sbuild being secret but about the overall change for Debian. I think that one is justified. Nothing to do with this subthread. As for http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd: $ grep sbuild http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd <em>wanna-build</em> and calls <em>sbuild</em> to build the packages. <dt><a href="http://packages.debian.org/sbuild";>sbuild</a></dt> This nice public page only points to the nice public sbuild debian package. There is no link to the actual sbuild used on buildds. Further the links for wanna-build and buildd (which probably indirectly included sbuild) are broken: http://m68k.debian.org/buildd/getting.html --> connection refused Did you by chance mean the wanna-build svn link on http://buildd.debian.org/? MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
