Adeodato "=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:51:24 +0100]: > > Hi, > >> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > They were, originally. Ryan's been very active on it since, and it's >> > diverged a bit from the code you're maintaining. > >> Then he should send patches and bug reports to the debian >> package. This split between the user/developer visible sbuild and the >> secret actual buildd is just not in the spirit of Debian. > > I believe this is wrong. In words of one of the sbuild package > co-maintainers, "the Debian package is the fork, while the sbuild in > wanna-build is upstream" [1]. And upstreams are not required forward > patches to their respective Debian maintainers, are they?; they just > make new versions publicly available, as already happens here. > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/11/msg01463.html > > Cheers, I'm sorry for that. I didn't see sbuild as an upstream + maintainer package but as a debian package. Developed by Debian people for Debian. Aparently that was a misconception on my part. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
